Re: perfusion confusion
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Roger Moretz <stamptrain@yahoo.com> |
To: | Karen Larison <larisonk@uoneuro.uoregon.edu>, HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Karen:
I don't have any references to the use of cold
fixatives for this purpose, but I can't believe that
perfusion with cold fixative would work that well.
The vasculature will contract upon the initial
exposure to the cold unless a relaxant has been used,
and even then I'm not sure that this will obviate that
problem. I have always used fixative that is at least
at room temp, and in some instances have run the
perfusion tubing through a warm water
bath--particularly since we were looking at the blood
brain barrier.
Roger Moretz
Dept of Toxicology
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
--- Karen Larison <larisonk@uoneuro.uoregon.edu>
wrote:
> Histonetters,
>
> One of the labs here is doing in situ hybridzation
> on developing rat brains. They
> have been using ice-cold perfusate on these rats as
> they believe that this prevents
> endogenous RNAses from acting. I have a hard time
> believing this, particularly in
> light of the evidence that paraformaldehyde fixation
> effectively neutralizes
> endogenous RNAses (J Neurosci Meth 85 (1998) pp
> 129-139). If this is true, why would
> you want to slow the fixation rate by perfusing with
> ice-cold perfusates?
>
> If anyone knows of any references that would clarify
> this issue or if anyone has had
> some practical experience on perfusion and in situ
> techniques, I'd appreciate hearing
> from you.
>
> Thanks for your kind advice.
>
> Karen in Oregon
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>