RE: Which H&E?
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet@histosearch.com |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Richard Allen makes a non mercuric Harris - 7211. It's the next best thing,
I think.
I like the instant eosin that Shandon carries. If you need vendor numbers
just let me know! J:>)
Joyce Weems
Pathology Manager
Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
-----Original Message-----
From: larisonk@uoneuro.uoregon.edu
[SMTP:larisonk@uoneuro.uoregon.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 6:04 AM
To: HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu
Subject: Which H&E?
Hello Netters,
I'm trying to brighten up my H&E stain. It's been suggested that I
switch from
Gill's #2 hematoxylin to Harris' hematoxylin. I'm hesitant to do
this, simply
because I'm loathe to use mercuric oxide if it can be avoided. Will
this change make
a big difference in the quality of my staining? (I'm staining adult
fish).
Also, it's been recommended that I switch to an eosin containing a
higher percentage
of alcohol. This is no problem, but are there problems I might
encounter by making
this switch?
Karen in Oregon
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>