RE: IgG vs IgM and Signet ultrastreptavidin
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Nocito, Joseph" <joseph_nocito@srhc.iwhs.org> |
To: | "'Terrett, Barb'" <Barb_Terrett@pmh.toronto.on.ca>, "'histonet@pathology.swmed.edu'" <histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu> |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Mon, 31 May 1999 09:51:21 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Barb,
I have used the Signet USA kit and have had good results even with
antibodies like CD-15 (IgM class)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terrett, Barb [SMTP:Barb_Terrett@pmh.toronto.on.ca]
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 1999 8:34 AM
> To: 'histonet@pathology.swmed.edu'
> Subject: IgG vs IgM and Signet ultrastreptavidin
>
> Good morning histonetters!
> I have a question for anyone using the Signet Ultra Streptavidin detection
> system reagents. Most of the Ab's we use are of the IgG chain composition,
> however, a few are of the IgM chain composition e.g. CD15 and sarcomeric
> actin. Right now we use a separate link for the IgM Ab's, but I was
> wondering if the signet link is o.k. to use with the IgM Ab's. This would
> safe some hassle. Does anyone have experience with this, or suitable
> references?
> Thanks for your time
> ttfn b :)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>