RE: Coverglass thickness
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | marjorie lehman <Marjorie.Lehman@unilever.com> |
To: | Scott Taft <ss336@yahoo.com>, HistoNet Server <HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
Most good research microscopes are set up to use 1.0 coverslips. You will
achieve much better resolution using them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Taft [SMTP:ss336@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:37 PM
To: HistoNet Server
Subject: Coverglass thickness
Hello Histonetters,
I have another question of the day to pose:
Is there a reason, other than cost, why your lab would
prefer 1.0 thickness coverglass over 1.5 thickness?
What is the reason your lab chooses what it currently
uses?
How about your Pathologists'?
PS- If you use tape, are you considering switching
back to glass?
Scott Taft HT(ASCP)
Tucson, AZ
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>