RE: Coverglass thickness

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From:marjorie lehman <Marjorie.Lehman@unilever.com>
To:Scott Taft <ss336@yahoo.com>, HistoNet Server <HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Reply-To:
Content-Type:TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

Most good research microscopes are set up to use 1.0 coverslips. You will
achieve much better resolution using them. 
-----Original Message-----
From:	Scott Taft [SMTP:ss336@yahoo.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 10, 2000 12:37 PM
To:	HistoNet Server
Subject:	Coverglass thickness

Hello Histonetters,

I have another question of the day to pose:

Is there a reason, other than cost, why your lab would
prefer 1.0 thickness coverglass over 1.5 thickness?

What is the reason your lab chooses what it currently
uses?

How about your Pathologists'?

PS- If you use tape, are you considering switching
back to glass?

Scott Taft HT(ASCP)
Tucson, AZ

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/




<< Previous Message | Next Message >>