Mart-1 IHC- I need your expertise please!!
|From:||Vinnie Della Speranza |
I'd appreciate any insight anyone may offer with the following.
we frequently perform Mart-1 ihc staining to demonstrate melanocytes.
We use a monoclonal antibody from Dako (clone A103 working dilution
1:50) for this marker and an alkaline phosphatase detection kit from
Biogenex utilizing a red chromogen. we perform high temperature antigen
retrieval in citrate buffer pH 6.0
our positive control is a nevus selected by one of our
dermatopathologists. we generally prepare a working dilution of this
antibody once each week
from time to time, we've received feedback that "not enough melanocytes
are staining" which causes the dermpathologist to conclude that the
antibody is not performing to expectations. Slides are always checked
prior to being turned in to verify that we have achieved the expected
pattern of staining, however we do not attempt to quantitate the # of
slides appearing positively stained with this marker.
I reviewed a case today that had been rejected by the pathologist. In
evaluating the epidermis of four pieces of excised skin (FFPE), I found
evidence of appropriate staining in each, although some areas of the
epidermis contained many positive cells, some areas only a few, some
areas none at all. the melanocytes in our control nevus stained with the
expected pattern and intensity.
My questions to you are as follows:
has anyone found variable Mart-1 staining in tissues such as I've
described and if so, can you elaborate as to it's suspected cause?
is it possible that handling of the specimen prior to fixation and
processing could cause the result we are experiencing?
is it possible that pretreatment of the surgical site in the patient,
including the use of topical or injected anesthetics or skin
disinfectants could cause variable Mart-1 staining?
is there something about the stability of this antibody that we haven't
considered that may be contributing to this situation?
is it possible that the pathologist expected a different outcome and
thus concluded that the stain results were incorrect?
your thoughts are most appreciated.
Vinnie Della Speranza
Manager for Anatomic Pathology Services
Medical University of South Carolina
165 Ashley Avenue Suite 309
Charleston, SC 29425
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>