Re: Photographic Film

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From:"Jeff Silverman" <peptolab@hamptons.com>
To:"Karen S Pawlowski" <kna101@utdallas.edu>, "Patrick M. Haley " <pmhales@cybergap.net>
Reply-To:
Date:Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:19:47 -0400
Content-Type:text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Netters,
I also use Kodak Gold 100 for publication prints and ask them to print the 
picture light, I think they call it the "gate", they set it at minus 2 and
my background comes out nice and white rather than blue or green. 
Jeff Silverman
----------
> From: Karen S Pawlowski <kna101@utdallas.edu>
> To: Patrick M. Haley  <pmhales@cybergap.net>
> Cc: Histonet <HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu>
> Subject: Re: Photographic Film
> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 11:58 AM
> 
> Hi Patrick,
> 
> I use Kodak Gold 100ASA and am pleased with the results.  (I used a
> filter LBD-2, to correct for the tungsten bulb on our Olympus BH-2.) 
> The trick, however, is getting the processing lab to print it correctly.
> I usually work with a lab near work and have always gotten the right
tint,
> but once when I was in a hurry-I took the film to another commercial lab
> which made the pictures have a dark yellow hue- I took the negatives in
to
> the other lab and they managed to print them with the proper hue.
> 
> There may be better films, but I haven't had any better luck with any of
> the others that I have tried. I get the best results with slide film- but
> I don't like the conversion of a slide image to print.
> 
> Karen Pawlowski
> 
> On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Patrick M. Haley  wrote:
> 
> > My question is concerning photomicrography;
> >     What brand of color 35mm film and ASA (film speed) is best suited
for
> > photographing H&E sections using an Olympus scope and camera setup?
> > I would like to produce prints, not 2x2 projection slides.
> > 
> > Thank You
> > 
> > Patrick M. Haley
> > Chief Technologist
> > HistoTechNologies, inc.
> > www.histology.net
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 



<< Previous Message | Next Message >>