RE: Comments on pathology computer systems needed

From:"Carson, Karla" <KCarson@chw.edu>

Mary, we have decided to go with the Cerner Millennium because we already
have Cerner in the Clinical lab and the interfaces will be less costly.
After evaluating CoPath and Tamtron, Tamtron would have been our other
choice but was too spendy for us.

Karla Carson HTL (ASCP)
Regional Pathology Manager
Mercy Health Care Sacramento
Phone 916-453-4494
FAX 916-453-4397
e-mail kcarson@chw.edu <mailto:kcarson@chw.edu> 

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Mary Bryhan [mailto:mbryhan@northernhealth.org]
		Sent:	Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:06 AM
		To:	histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
		Subject:	Comments on pathology computer systems
needed

		Hi to all- 
		We are currently in the early stages of selecting an AP
package, the three that our laboratory IS person has selected are Cerner
Millennium, SCC and CoPath.  Any comments either pro or con on the usability
and reliability of each would be helpful.

		Mary Bryhan HT (ASCP)
		Northern Michigan Hospital
		Petoskey, Michigan


		Mary Bryhan HT (ASCP)
		Northern Michigan Hospital
		Petoskey, Michigan

		




<< Previous Message | Next Message >>