Re: FDA Final Rule
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Tim Morken" <timcdc@hotmail.com> |
To: | HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 1999 07:39:22 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain; format=flowed |
The manufacturer has to decide how to classify the reagent, not the user.
Tim Morken, B.A., EMT(MSA), HTL(ASCP)
Infectious Disease Pathology
Centers for Disease Control
MS-G32
1600 Clifton Rd.
Atlanta, GA 30333
USA
email: tim9@cdc.gov
timcdc@hotmail.com
Phone: (404) 639-3964
FAX: (404)639-3043
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Goodwin, Diana" <DGoodwin@CHSNJ.org>
To: "'Histonet'" <HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Subject: FDA Final Rule
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 09:52:53 -0400
Good Morning , Histonet.
After reading Debbie Jennings-Sienna's article in the latest edition of
NSH in Action, I am still confused as to the classification of
commercially available primary antibodies. Are they or are they not
considered to be ASR's? Are we or are we not, as a clinical laboratory,
required to include a disclaimer on reports to clinicians of patients on
whom our lab has performed IHC testing using commercially available
primary antibodies?
Diana Goodwin, HT
Trenton, NJ
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>