Re: Formaldehyde recycler & assaying
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | sharon oaborn <so4decolores@earthlink.net> |
To: | "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca>, RSRICHMOND@aol.com |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Wed, 08 Sep 1999 22:05:56 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
ANATECH makes the buffer salts kits for re-assaying and buffering formalin
out of the distillation process. sharon osborn
-----Original Message-----
From: J. A. Kiernan <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca>
To: RSRICHMOND@aol.com <RSRICHMOND@aol.com>
Cc: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Date: Friday, September 03, 1999 7:26 AM
Subject: Re: Formaldehyde recycler & assaying
>On Thu, 2 Sep 1999 RSRICHMOND@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I have no experience with the formaldehyde still, and that's what I'd
like to
>> know more about. In my experience, assaying the formaldehyde and mixing
the
>> buffer salts would be beyond the skills of most laboratories (I NEVER saw
a
>> lab prepare neutral buffered formalin correctly). The only way I can
imagine
>> this being practical is with kits of pre-mixed buffer phosphates, and
I've
>> been surprised that nobody ever made these available. Are they available
now?
>
> If you're really keen on having a physiologically buffered and isotonic
> phosphate solution, then Dulbecco's balanced salt solution is the one
> to go for: kind to cultured cells and doesn't need a CO2-enriched
> atmosphere to maintain its pH. It is, in fact, PBS with cell-friendly
> amounts of potassium, calcium and magnesium ions. It's fairly easily
> made by weighing and dissolving 6 cheap ingredients, but even more
> easily generated by chucking a little pot of pre-mixed Dulbecco powder
> into a litre of distilled water. Several companies sell the little
> pots of powder. It costs more but saves time, and there is nothing
> secret about what you're buying in the kit, so it's OK to use it in
> research. The recipe was published in 1954: J. Exp. Med. 99, 167-182.
> (This popular solution is a by-product of an otherwise largely
> forgotten publication.)
>
> Assaying the recovered formaldehyde should not be necessary for most
> purposes because the concentration of this compound in a fixative
> solution is not at all critical. The concentration of monomeric
> methylene glycol and low polymers (active in fixation) increases
> with the dilution. Consequently it's possible to use neat formalin
> (37-40% HCHO) or a 1:100 dilution (0.4% HCHO) without changing the
> chemical reactivity with proteins. It's always necessary to allow
> enough time for formaldehyde fixation (a few days, at least) and
> the much shorter times currently used in routine histopathology
> produce tissues fixed only partly by formaldehyde and mostly by the
> coagulative action of the solvents used for dehydration.
> For everything you could ever want to know about formaldehyde,
> see the book, "Formaldehyde" by JF Walker. 3rd edn, 1964, Reinhold,
> New York.
>
> John A. Kiernan,
> Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology,
> The University of Western Ontario,
> LONDON, Canada N6A 5C1
>
>
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>