I'm very interested in this subject. I've thought of using this approach for labeling slides. However, I am nervous about the labels staying on years down the line. Also there is the double check of the handwriting. There are 2 checks of identity when handwriting first, but there are also 2 opportunities to mislabel the slide.
What is best practice with only using barcoded labels and not handwriting? Is the practice widespread enough that there is a consensus.
Ross M Stapf
Histopathology Manager
Baylor University Medical Center
3500 Gaston Ave.
Dallas, TX 75246
214-820-2465
214-820-4110 fax
RossS@baylorhealth.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Angela Bitting
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 8:37 AM
To: histonet
Subject: [Histonet] barcode labels vs handwritten
Hi Folks,
I am running into resistance with a few of our pathologists regarding the use of barcoded labels. They want us to handwrite our slides and then apply our permanent labels over top of that. We are using the Stainershield labels that are solvent-resistant. We eliminated the step of relabeling our slides with the permanent labels at the sorting area, and began having the cutter label their slides with the permanent labels at the microtome area as part of a Lean workflow initiative. However, a few of our Pathologists like having the handwriting underneath the label so they can see who cut the slide if it is of poor quality. Also, if they think it is mislabeled they say that gives them a clue as to where the slide really came from. I guess I feel like, if the slide is mislabeled it doesn't matter where it came from, it still needs to be recut from the correct block. I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions about this issue.
Thanks,
Angie
Angela Bitting, HT(ASCP)
Technical Specialist, Histology
Geisinger Medical Center
100 N Academy Ave. MC 23-00
Danville, PA 17822
phone 570-214-9634
fax 570-271-5916
No trees were hurt in the sending of this email
However many electrons were severly inconvienienced!
IMPORTANT WARNING: The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the documents attached to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have created and notify me immediately by replying to this email. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
**********************************************************************
This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) and entity(ies) to whom it is addressed. If you are the intended recipient, further disclosures are prohibited without proper authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, or use of this information is strictly prohibited and possibly a violation of federal or state law and regulations. If you have received this information in error, please notify Baylor Health Care System immediately at 1-866-402-1661 or via e-mail at privacy@baylorhealth.edu. Baylor Health Care System, its subsidiaries, and affiliates hereby claim all applicable privileges related to this information.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
|