[Histonet] Histotech position at Buffalo General Hospital
|From:||"Featherstone, Annette" |
We currently have 2 histotech positions open at Kaleida Health, Buffalo
General Hospital in sunny Buffalo NY. Two shifts are available 4-12midnight
and 8-4pm. These are full time, with full benefits and a great working
environment. Please contact me if you are interested.
Annette Featherstone HT/MLT
Kaleida Health, Buffalo General Hospital
100 High St.
Buffalo, NY 12403
From: Greg Dobbin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 08:54
To: Carla M Conway
Subject: Re: [Histonet] quantitative graded scale for IHC
I certainly may be corrected by others on this but I personally don't
think you will obtain statistically valid data by grading intensity of the
reaction between cells or fields or sections. There is just so much
room for subjectivity and for that matter, variability between runs or
perhaps even between slides within runs!
What you may want to try is calculating a ratio of positive to
negative (perhaps pos. cells vs. neg. cells in a given area). For
instance: place a grid with 50 or 100 intersects on the computer
monitor, choose a microscopic field (in a random or systematic-
random manner), and then at each intersect decide whether the
reaction at that point is positive or negative. If at any particular
intersect you have trouble to decide whether it is pos or neg, have
a system that does not permit subjectivity, such as: for such points
where the call could go either way, look at the space imediately to
the left of the y-axis and above the x-axis and then make your
decision. Determination of the number of fields you need to sample
in order to obtain statistically valid data is very important and a
matter for a statistician to explain and/or determine for you (which I
most definately am not) unless you happen to have that training
Another idea would be to have the image analysis software either
measure the area of or count the number of pixels in a given area
(field) that are "this red or redder". This involves choosing a
relatively arbitrational threshold for the degree of redness that is to
be measured or counted and applying the exact same setting to all
other fields and sections in the study. My personal experience
(using Bioquant NOVA) has been this sounds great in theory but
was very difficult to pull off! The good old-fashioned counting was
much more reliable and for that matter, easier to defend in
presentation or publication.
I am eager to hear other ideas or methods that might also work!
From: "Carla M Conway"
Date sent: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:22:02 -0700
Copies to: Subject: [Histonet] quantitative
graded scale for IHC
> I would like to devise a quantitative graded scale for IHC results which
> would provide more info than just +/- staining.
> I have a reference where IHC staining intensity was rated (from pale pink
> to dark red) using alkaline phosphatase/Vector-Red, however we are using
> Envision+/AEC which seems to be an all or nothing (red or no red)
> with no gradation. We just received ImagePro image analysis software, so
> this may be another route to try. Thanks in advance for any comments or
> suggestions you may have.
> Carla Conway
> Western Fisheries Research Center
> Seattle, WA
> Histonet mailing list
Atlantic Veterinary College, U.P.E.I.
550 University Ave.
Canada, C1A 4P3
Happiness is a journey, not a destination.
Histonet mailing list
This email transmission and any documents, files,
or previous e-mail messages attached to it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, or a person
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any further review,
disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution, or
use of any of the information contained in or attached
to this e-mail transmission is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail, discard
any paper copies, and delete all electronic files
of the message. If you are unable to contact the
sender or you are not sure as to whether you
are the intended recipient, please e-mail
ISTSEC@KaleidaHealth.org or call (716) 859-7777.
Histonet mailing list
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>