Re: special stains - Internet pictures mostly poor.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, swansong (Who's He/She?) wrote:
> I know that this may sound redundant, but I really am in desperate need of
> these pictures, If anyone has or knows which website may contain these
> beautiful stains, Please let me know.
Do not despair. Help may be locally available and better than stuff
you might find on a web site.
Most histology pictures that I have collected from the internet are of
such poor quality that they cannot be evaluated at all. This includes
photomicrographs promulgated by companies to promote their fixatives
etc. I have a humble 14" SVGA monitor, but it shows many pictures with
crisp resolution. The fault with internet photomicrographs lies either
with the original pictures or with effects of file compression. I
suspect the former. Most downloaded micrographs look as if they were
taken from incorrectly illuminated microscopes.
For normal tissues stained by a variety of methods, the atlas by
Wheater et al is pretty good, and probably better value for money
than some CD-ful of computer-mangled coloured but Kohler-deficient
images. You're unlikely to find realistic pictures of "special
stains" for free. If your interests are similar to those of
pathologists, someone at a nearby hospital might lend you some
slides. If it's for research, you should have no trouble at all
getting standard slides from your colleagues.
John A. Kiernan,
Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology,
The University of Western Ontario,
LONDON, Canada N6A 5C1
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>