Re: Murphy's "missing specimens"
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Michelle McCafferty <mmccaff@mbl.edu> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
This one definitely gets the EEE-GADS! award. I thought the skin
punch biopsy in the trouser leg cuff was bad (gross), but this one is a real
stunner. Yikes!
Michelle
Michelle McCafferty
Marine Biological Laboratory
7 MBL Street
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1015
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998 RMAH@wpog.childhosp.bc.ca wrote:
> The recent recollections of how patient specimens go missing remind me
> of my earlier (I'm not that old) days at another hospital, when our
> prosectionist was attempting to bisect a referred-in, formalin-fixed punch
> biopsy of skin. As you all know, fixed tissues are somewhat rubbery. In
> order to describe the specimen more adequately, she brought her head
> closer towards the bench and proceeded to speak at the same time as
> her scalpel blade touched the biopsy. B-O-I-N-G!!!!! She tiddlely-winked
> that piece of skin into her mouth, gag-reflexed, and swallowed it whole.
> The final report only stated "specimen lost in processing".
>
>
>
>
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>