We use Macintosh computers and do most all of our scanning 
on an AGFA Arcus II.  I'm not sure if they sell that model 
any longer but I'm sure the latest model would have at lest 
the same quality if not better.  We scan x-rays, 35 mm 
slides, we have even placed MMA embedded sections directly 
in the scanner and got excellent results.

-- 
Karen Bowden
Staff Research Associate II
University of CA, San Diego
Department of Orthopedics
9500 Gilman Dr. 0630
La Jolla, CA 92093-0630
858-277-4970

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
THE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY 
FOR THE
PERSON OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN 
CONFIDENTIAL
AND/OR PRIVILEGED MATERIAL. ANY REVIEW, RETRANSMISSION, 
DISSEMINATION OR
OTHER USE OF OR TAKING OF ANY ACTION IN RELIANCE UPON THIS 
INFORMATION
BY PERSONS OR ENTITIES OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT IS 
PROHIBITED.
IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE 
SENDER AND
DELETE THE MATERIAL FROM ANY COMPUTER.


Margaret Gondo wrote:
> Hi all -
> 
> I was just wondering if anyone out in Histoland has any 
> recommendations on flatbed scanners that will do a decent job of 
> scanning an EM negative.  Our lab uses mostly Macintosh computers 
> for imaging.  I will admit that I know very little about scanners.  
> I just visited a site that had film scanners that cost in the 
> thousands along with flatbed scanners with similar DPI for a couple 
> hundred.
> 
> Any information would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Margaret 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 





_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet