RE: Chloroacetate Esterase
From: | "DeLovino, Salvacion S." |
I think it's being sent to all who writes in. I just ignored mine. Mark my
word, I'm gonna get another one for writing this.
Salvacion
> ----------
> From: Martin, Ronald[SMTP:Ronald.Martin@umassmed.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:26 AM
> Cc: 'histonet@pathology.swmed.edu'
> Subject: RE: Chloroacetate Esterase
>
> Is anyone else receiving these wonderful e mails or is it just my lucky
> day?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rene [mailto:rene-vh@planet.nl]
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 9:40 AM
> To: Martin, Ronald
> Subject: Re: Chloroacetate Esterase
>
> PISS OFF
>
>
> ..
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Martin, Ronald
> To: 'Johnston, Kathy' ; Histonet
> (E-mail)
>
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:46 PM
> Subject: RE: Chloroacetate Esterase
>
>
> > Kathy,
> > I think that if these unprofessional emails are
> originating from their
> place
> > of employment then perhaps their superiors should know of
> their behavior
> and
> > they definitely should be banned from histonet. Enough is
> enough!!!
> > Ron Martin
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Johnston, Kathy [mailto:Kathy.Johnston@CLS.ab.ca]
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:29 PM
> > To: Histonet (E-mail)
> > Subject: FW: Chloroacetate Esterase
> >
> > I do apologize for the rough language, but I've had just
> > about enough from
> > this person. Is there any possible way of preventing them
> > from accessing
> > Histonet in the future?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rene [mailto:rene-vh@planet.nl]
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:10 AM
> > To: Johnston, Kathy
> > Subject: Re: Chloroacetate Esterase
> >
> >
> > FUCK OFF
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Johnston, Kathy
> > To: Histonet (E-mail)
> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:39 PM
> > Subject: Chloroacetate Esterase
> >
> >
> > > We are using Sigma's Chloroacetate Esterase kit, and are
> > doing one on a B5
> > > fixed bone marrow slide. Our problem is thus: Both
> > myself and the stains
> > > tech recall in the recesses of our collective memories,
> > that Na
> > thio/iodine
> > > to remove the mercury pigment produces a false negative
> > for this test.
> > >
> > > Is there anyone else out there that confirms or
> > contradicts this?? We are
> > > reluctant to proceed and possibly ruin a slide, as well,
> > we do not want to
> > > stain it, and leave a bunch of mercury which may impair
> > diagnosis.
> > >
> > > Your help is greatly appreciated!
> > >
> > > Kathy Johnston
> > > Tech II - Special Stains
> > > Anatomic Pathology - Foothills Medical Center
> > > Calgary Laboratory Services
> > > Ph - 403-944-4760
> > > Fax - 403-270-4093
> > > kathy.johnston@cls.ab.ca
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>