Ron,
We are all getting them and sometimes it is better to delete and ignore ill
mannered children.  Pam Marcum

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin, Ronald [mailto:Ronald.Martin@umassmed.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:27 AM
> Cc: 'histonet@pathology.swmed.edu'
> Subject: RE: Chloroacetate Esterase
>
>
> Is anyone else receiving these wonderful e mails or is it just my
> lucky day?
>
> 		-----Original Message-----
> 		From:	rene [mailto:rene-vh@planet.nl]
> 		Sent:	Saturday, October 12, 2002 9:40 AM
> 		To:	Martin, Ronald
> 		Subject:	Re: Chloroacetate Esterase
>
> 		PISS OFF
>
>
> 		..
> 		----- Original Message -----
> 		From: Martin, Ronald 
> 		To: 'Johnston, Kathy' ; Histonet
> (E-mail)
> 		
> 		Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:46 PM
> 		Subject: RE: Chloroacetate Esterase
>
>
> 		> Kathy,
> 		> I think that if these unprofessional emails are
> originating from their
> 		place
> 		> of employment then perhaps their superiors should know of
> their behavior
> 		and
> 		> they definitely should be banned from histonet. Enough is
> enough!!!
> 		> Ron Martin
> 		>
> 		> -----Original Message-----
> 		> From: Johnston, Kathy [mailto:Kathy.Johnston@CLS.ab.ca]
> 		> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 2:29 PM
> 		> To: Histonet (E-mail)
> 		> Subject: FW: Chloroacetate Esterase
> 		>
> 		> I do apologize for the rough language, but I've had just
> 		> about enough from
> 		> this person.  Is there any possible way of preventing them
> 		> from accessing
> 		> Histonet in the future?
> 		>
> 		> -----Original Message-----
> 		> From: rene [mailto:rene-vh@planet.nl]
> 		> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 11:10 AM
> 		> To: Johnston, Kathy
> 		> Subject: Re: Chloroacetate Esterase
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> FUCK OFF
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> ----- Original Message -----
> 		> From: Johnston, Kathy 
> 		> To: Histonet (E-mail) 
> 		> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:39 PM
> 		> Subject: Chloroacetate Esterase
> 		>
> 		>
> 		> > We are using Sigma's Chloroacetate Esterase kit, and are
> 		> doing one on a B5
> 		> > fixed bone marrow slide.  Our problem is thus:  Both
> 		> myself and the stains
> 		> > tech recall in the recesses of our collective memories,
> 		> that Na
> 		> thio/iodine
> 		> > to remove the mercury pigment produces a false negative
> 		> for this test.
> 		> >
> 		> > Is there anyone else out there that confirms or
> 		> contradicts this??  We are
> 		> > reluctant to proceed and possibly ruin a slide, as well,
> 		> we do not want to
> 		> > stain it, and leave a bunch of mercury which may impair
> 		> diagnosis.
> 		> >
> 		> > Your help is greatly appreciated!
> 		> >
> 		> > Kathy Johnston
> 		> > Tech II - Special Stains
> 		> > Anatomic Pathology - Foothills Medical Center
> 		> > Calgary Laboratory Services
> 		> > Ph - 403-944-4760
> 		> > Fax - 403-270-4093
> 		> > kathy.johnston@cls.ab.ca
> 		> >
> 		> >
> 		>
> 		>
>
>
>