re:cryostat decontamination
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | LINDA MARGRAF MD <LMARGRAF@childmed.dallas.tx.us> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Here's a response to the message I posted for Bernice.
Please note I am simply posting her messages ...I have no knowledge of or
experience with the equipment her company sells and do not in any way
endorse it.
Linda M
Histonet administrator
Dear Linda,
This sounds very dangerous, as I am lead to believe the secondary filter
will not stop all
pathogens passing through it, and the airflow propel them all over the
laboratory.
Alan Bright
Bright Instrument Co. Ltd
-----Original Message-----
From: LINDA MARGRAF MD <LMARGRAF@childmed.dallas.tx.us>
To: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 1998 11:11
Subject: Cryostat decontamination
>Here's a message Bernice asked me to post to you all:
>
>Hi histonetters,
>Just wanted to weigh in on the subject of decontaminating the cryostat.
>Instrumedics has a vacuum system (Cryo-Vac-Away) for the cryostat which is
>not a true decontaminating system but goes a very long way toward
>protection of the operator and the laboratory from infectious material
>generated in a cryostat.
> All the trimming debris generated when facing off the frozen block is
>suctioned away at the blockface and captured in a canister which contains a
>fine and coarse filter.
> Downstream of the primary filters is a secondary bacterial filter which
>will capture pathogens, bacterial or viral, that escape the debris. The
>filter system is inside the cryostat.
>The debris does not leave the cryostat where is can cause problems!
>The cryostat remains spotless and the biohazards associated with sectioning
>infectious material very substantially reduced.
>
>Bernice Schiller
>schiller@instrumedics.com
>
>
>
!
>
>
>
!
!
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>