Re: Cryostats.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Alan Bright <Bright@dial.pipex.com> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Montgomery <ian.montgomery@bio.gla.ac.uk>
To: HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu <HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Date: Thursday, November 12, 1998 05:05
Subject: Cryostats.
> Know of a lab that recently bought 3 Leica cryostats, all bummers.
>Were exchanged but even these were not very good. I'm not anti Leica, they
>make good instruments, but 6 bum cryostats is not a good advertisement.
>Ian.
>
>Dr. Ian Montgomery,
>West Medical Building,
>University of Glasgow,
>Glasgow,
>G12 8QQ,
>Scotland.
>Tel: 0141 339 8855 Extn. 6602.
>Fax: 0141 330 4100.
>e-mail: ian.montgomery@bio.gla.ac.uk
>
>
>
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dear Dr. Montgomery,
Does bummers in this case, mean the same as the statement made by Gerald
Ratner but expensive ?
Alan Bright
Bright Instrument Co. Ltd.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>