>Received: from [129.112.1.32] by hotmail.com (1.0) with SMTP id
MHotMail308773653010673506532503217160118435530; Thu Nov 05 08:35:40
1998
>Received: from 129.112.18.39 ([129.112.18.39])
> by SWAX32.SWMED.EDU (PMDF V5.1-8 #18228)
> with SMTP id <01J3T83YT85A94OZSX@SWAX32.SWMED.EDU> for
june_shin@hotmail.com;
> Thu, 5 Nov 1998 10:35:32 CST
>Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 09:55:31 -0500
>From: Cheryl Crowder <crowder@vt8200.vetmed.lsu.edu>
>Subject: Cryostats
>To: HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu
>Message-id: <1301862765-4092142@svmmac.vetmed.lsu.edu>
>MIME-version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I got into the cryostat discussion late but if you're comparing them,
have
>you tried the Leica.  We have had a manual one for years with only one
>problem - a switch which controlled the object holder.  We could still
cut
>frozens while waiting for its receipt.  There is also a motorized Leica
in
>another department and they love that one.  It is a research department
and
>they need serial and step sections more often than we do.  I haven't
seen
>any other messages on the Histonet about the Leica, but we really like
ours.
>Cheryl Crowder, LSU - SVM
>
>We have had a Leica CM3000 for about 4 years in our Dermatology
department for Moh's surgery.  We absolutely love it and have had very
little trouble.  Cuts like a dream. We like it so much that we have
ordered the CM1900 (stand up version) for our Frozen Section room.

June Shin
Technical Specialist
Women's College Hospital
Toronto, Ontario CANADA

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com