RE: [Histonet] Autoimmunostainers DAKO vs Ventanna[Scanned]

From:"Darren James"

As another option take a look at the Bond Max manufactured by Vision Bio

It performs on board dewaxing, heat induced epitope retreival, enzyme
digestion as well as counterstaining.
I have only heard good things about it.

I have used the Dako extensively and although good, it has it's limitations.
At the time we chose the Dako over the Ventana due to the Ventana being a
closed system. If I were in a position to purchase another I would
definitely take a long hard look at the Bond Max.

Thanks and have a great day
Darren James

-----Original Message-----
[]On Behalf Of Kemlo
Sent: Wednesday, 1 December 2004 4:36 a.m.
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Autoimmunostainers DAKO vs Ventanna[Scanned]

WE have both, and I'm told the Ventana is the 'better' of the two options.
As an ICC virgin and one who will have to choose which platform to go with I
am particularly interested in this thread.

I would prefer to use the cheapest 'open' system that is a automated as
possible, is that mutually exclusive?

Kemlo Rogerson
Cellular Pathology Manager
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
DD. 01254-294162
Mobile 0774-9754194

-----Original Message-----
From: Maliniak, Richard []
Sent: 30 November 2004 15:16
Subject: [Histonet] Autoimmunostainers DAKO vs Ventanna[Scanned]

        I am looking for info= rmation from people who have switched from
   Ventanna  to  DAKO  and DAKO to V= entanna.  Why did you switch?  What
   did you like or dislike abo= ut one or the other.

   Important news about our email communications
   Saint  Barnabas  Health  Care  System has implemented secure messaging
   servic= es.
   To learn more about SBHCS Secure Messaging, go to:
   [1]http://www.zixcorp.c= om/evangelism/sbhcs/
   If  you  need  assistance with retrieving a secure email, please email
   sbhcs= or visit
   [2] tners/receiving.php


   1. 3D""
Histonet mailing list

Histonet mailing list

Histonet mailing list

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>