RE: [Histonet] cryosectioning adult fish teeth?
It is difficult to cut teeth no matter what, but I would say your best bet
would be to use the tape transfer sectioning aide from Instrumedics. I have
cut whole calcified rat femurs using this technique and got decent sections.
There can be a problem with doing IHC on these sections though. You use a
polymer coated slide to attach the tape section to and the coating can
interfere or cause background in IHC. I am at Fitzsimmons in Aurora and
would be happy to let you come over to my lab and try to cut your sections
in my cryostat using my tape system, or you could send me some frozen
samples and I could try to cut them for you.
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Josh Trapani
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: [Histonet] cryosectioning adult fish teeth?
I have been attempting to cryosection pharyngeal teeth (and associated
structures) of adult fish for immunohistochemistry, with very limited
success. I have been working mostly with zebrafish but also with some
cichlids; adult body lengths are < 5 cm. The problem is that even when the
section as a whole is good, the tissue within it contracts, folds, and
just doesn't hold together. The protocol I am currently using is as
-Immediately after death, branchial arches are dissected out and fixed
overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4 C.
-Fixed material is then transferred to PolyNoCal (Polysciences);
decalcification takes < 24 h at 4 C.
-Material is then transferred to 30% sucrose solution and left overnight
or until the specimen sinks...this also at 4 C.
-Finally, material is embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT, frozen carefully in
liquid nitrogen, mounted and cut at -20 C. Optimally, I would like
sections of 15 microns thickness.
Some variations I have tried that don't improve things much include:
sectioning whole heads instead of dissecting out branchial arches, longer
fixation times, decalcification in 4% EDTA (takes a lot longer), freezing
of specimens in the cryostat just prior to sectioning rather than with
liquid nitrogen beforehand, and cutting sections up to 30 microns thick
(thicker sections do generally hold together better, but it's still not
Searches of the literature have not helped me come up with a better
protocol. Something tells me if I had more histological experience, the
solution would be obvious, but I may be wrong. My best guess right now
is some incompatibility between the tissue and the freezing medium, so I'm
looking into alternative freezing media.
If anyone has any suggestions or knows of a protocol that works (for
cryosectioning mineralized tissues in adult fish, or any lower
vertebrates really), I would be very appreciative.
My apologies if this question has come up before (though somehow I doubt
Postdoctoral Research Associate
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of Colorado
Boulder, CO 80309-0334
Histonet mailing list
Histonet mailing list
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>