--WebTV-Mail-735401077-9905
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Hello Histonetters!  I know a lot of you are involved in research & was
wondering if any of you have found any truth to the following that I
have forwarded.  Have any of the Dr's you work with heard of this.  It's
pretty scary if this is true.  Any comments or possible links are
appreciated.
Thank you,
Kim, HT


--WebTV-Mail-735401077-9905
Content-Disposition: Inline
Content-Type: Message/RFC822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Received: from mailsorter-102-1.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.98) by
	postoffice-161.iap.bryant.webtv.net; Sat, 15 May 1999 13:33:35
	-0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <Peepsy41@aol.com>
Received: from imo21.mx.aol.com (imo21.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.65]) by
	mailsorter-102-1.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97)
	with ESMTP id NAA14226 for <Poobear31@webtv.net>; Sat, 15 May 1999
	13:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Peepsy41@aol.com
Received: from Peepsy41@aol.com (8076) by imo21.mx.aol.com (IMOv20) id
	2XWIa19519; Sat, 15 May 1999 16:32:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <7c45f2e0.246f33e3@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 16:32:35 EDT
Subject: Fwd: WG: [Fwd: FYI]
To: Ciociski@aol.com, Poobear31@webtv.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_7c45f2e0.246f33e3_boundary"
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 10


--part1_7c45f2e0.246f33e3_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Kimmy. Any scientific truth to this??  Maybe Doc u work for has heard of 
this?? Let me know.

--part1_7c45f2e0.246f33e3_boundary
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <owner-wegeners@weareb.org>
Received: from  rly-ya03.mx.aol.com (rly-ya03.mail.aol.com [172.18.144.195])
	by air-ya01.mail.aol.com (v59.4) with SMTP; Fri, 14 May 1999 15:54:29
	-0400
Received: from  hugh.weareb.org (hugh.weareb.org [208.21.241.97]) by
	rly-ya03.mx.aol.com (vx) with SMTP; Fri, 14 May 1999 15:54:03 -0400
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by hugh.weareb.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA23482
	for wegeners-outgoing; Fri, 14 May 1999 14:47:25 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: hugh.weareb.org: majordom set sender to
	owner-wegeners@weareb.org using -f
Received: from mail.sota-oh.com (mail.sota-oh.com [216.28.82.91])
	by hugh.weareb.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23477
	for <wegeners@weareb.org>; Fri, 14 May 1999 14:47:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from russvale ([216.28.93.118]) by mail.sota-oh.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59746U18800L10500S0V35)
          with SMTP id com; Fri, 14 May 1999 15:44:06 -0400
Message-ID: <373CA6C3.6490@nobleco.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 15:42:11 -0700
From: "Valentine, Russ" <r.valentine@nobleco.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dottie <Dottieteaches@hotmail.com>, larry everett <leverett@uthct.edu>,
        "lauriec93@hotmail.com" <lauriec93@hotmail.com>, fossey@uthct.edu,
        scott fossey <sfossey@ibm.net>, saparks99@yahoo.com,
        iluvfb94@hotmail.com, vlynch@cnsresearch.com, wegeners@weareb.org
Subject: WG: [Fwd: FYI]
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-wegeners@weareb.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: wegeners@weareb.org

Return-Path: <leverett@uthct.edu>
Received: from athena.uthct.edu ([192.88.11.200]) by mail.sota-oh.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59746U18800L10500S0V35)
          with SMTP id com for <r.valentine@nobleco.net>;
          Fri, 14 May 1999 10:24:24 -0400
Received: from [198.213.160.108] by athena.uthct.edu (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/04Mar96-1144AM)
	id AA21345; Fri, 14 May 1999 09:25:47 -0500
Message-Id: <373C3261.B07E9503@uthct.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 09:25:37 -0500
From: "L. Everett" <leverett@uthct.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC)
X-Accept-Language: en
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Emma Strickland <strickla@jarvis.edu>,
        Dierdre Taylor <deirdre.taylor@solidsystems.com>,
        Diedre Taylor <dtaylor@uthct.edu>, kathy arteaga <karteaga@uthct.edu>,
        Lupe Wilson <lue_wilson@yahoo.com>, Melanie <r.valentine@nobleco.net>,
        Ruth Morris <ormorris@uthct.edu>,
        Vickie Clements <vickie.clement@oag.state.tx.us>
Subject: FYI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


>Fory Your Information
>  ----------
>Subject: FW: Breast Cancer Warning
>
>  Please read and pass this information on to others.  It may save
lives.
> > Listen up, ladies . . .Here's a shocker!
> > BREAST CANCER PREVENTION - not just for women
> > Men don't forget to tell mom, cousins, etc.
> > Deodorants (non-antiperspirants) are very hard to find but there are

a
>
> > few out there.
>
> > I just got information from a health seminar that I would like to
>share.
>
> > The leading cause of breast cancer is the use of anti-perspirant.
>
> > What?
>
> > Yes ANTI-PERSPIRANT.  Most of the products out there are an
> > anti-perspirant/deodorant combination so go home and check your
>labels.
> >
> > Deodorant is fine, anti-perspirant is not.  Here's why:  The human
>body
> > has  a few areas that it uses to purge toxins; behind the knees,
>behind
> > the ears, groin area, and armpits.  The toxins are purged in the
form
>of
> > perspiration.
> >
> > Anti-perspirant, as the name clearly indicates, prevents you from
> > perspiring, thereby inhibiting the body from purging toxins from
below
> > the armpits. These toxins do not just magically disappear.  Instead,

>the
> > body deposits them in the lymph nodes below the arms since it cannot

>sweat
> > them out.
> >
> > This causes a high concentration of toxins and leads to cell
>mutations:
> > a.k.a. CANCER.  Nearly all breast cancer tumors occur in the upper
> > outside quadrant of the breast area.  This is precisely where the
>lymph
> > nodes are located.
> >
> > Additionally, men are less likely (but not completely exempt) to
> > develop breast cancer prompted by anti-perspirant usage because most

>of
> > the anti-perspirant product is caught in their hair and is not
>directly
> > applied to the skin.  Women who apply anti-perspirant right after
>shaving
> > increase the risk further because shaving causes almost
imperceptible
>
> > nicks in the skin which give the chemicals entrance into the body
from
>the
> > armpit area. PLEASE pass this along to anyone you care about.
Breast
> > Cancer is becoming frighteningly common. This awareness may save
>lives.
> > If you are skeptical about these findings, I urge you to do some
>research
> >  You for yourself.> will arrive at the same conclusions, I assure
you.
>
>




--part1_7c45f2e0.246f33e3_boundary--

--WebTV-Mail-735401077-9905--