Routes to becoming a histotech
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | FreidaC@aol.com |
To: | histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Tue, 4 May 1999 21:30:42 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
The problem is that there are not enough accredited programs to train
histotechs. I do not think that anyone would deny that the most desirable
way to become a histotech is through an accredited program. There are less
than 30 in the US, so obviously that is not enough to train all of the
histotechs needed. So the majority of histotechs are on the job trained, and
will continue to be trained that way. In the past, today, and until 2005, a
high school graduate with no chemistry, biology, or math, can be on-the-job
trained and then sit for the certifying exam. That is just not an adequate
background for today's increasingly complex histopathology laboratory, and it
is proven by the much higher failure rate of those coming to the exam through
the high school route. We need more NAACLS accredited programs desperately -
anyone interested in beginning one, preferably in association with a
community college?
Incidentally, 56% of the accredited programs now either require an AA degree
for entry into the program or award an AA degree upon completion of the
program. All programs require a specified number of hours of math, biology,
and chemistry. This is required by NAACLS. I would anticipate that some of
those that are certificate programs will now begin to think about becoming AA
programs.
May I also address Karen's confusion. You can have an AA degree that
includes a specific number of hours in chemistry, biology, and math before
you begin your on-the-job training or you can complete the degree during or
after training. But you must have it before you apply for the exam as of
2005. The requirements of the NAACLS accredited programs vary with the
program as stated previously.
Hope this helps somewhat.
Freida Carson
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>