I think we are talking about side issues and not the bigger picture here. I believe that many histotechs return to this "salary discussion" because we are puzzled as to why histotechs are so lacking in both pay and respect. I've said it before that we are in a pickle because of 3 basic reasons. Number one would be the fact that histotechs were bench trained for so many years with no degree needed. Number two is the fact that the vast majority of histotechs are female and sexism is alive and well in our world today. Lastly, pathologists have not made a point to strengthen a histotechs place in the lab/hospital. Don't get me wrong, some Pathologists go out of their way to champion our cause but most, especially in the past, had/have a vested interest in seeing that histo-pay is kept low.
The puzzling thing is that basic principles that sould govern the status/pay of a profession like histotechnology such as supply&demand or complexity of the job doesn't seem to apply in our case. The result is that we are confused as to why things don't get better for the profession and we sometimes beat our chests and say things like "we rule" or insinuate that we are more important than we are...perhaps to stroke egos that could use some stroking every once in a while.
Just My Opinion,
Glen Dawson BS, HT & QIHC
From: Jennifer MacDonald [mailto:JMacDonald@mtsac.edu]
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:52 PM
To: Rene J Buesa
Cc: Dawson, Glen; email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Salary Scales
While I agree with Renee that histotechs have to make many decisions, I don't necessarily agree that they make more decisions that other areas in the lab. I worked in the clinical lab for many years and had to make many decisions regarding the adequacy of a specimen and interpret the QC before that result could be released. Manual differentials require that the tech know the morphology of all cell types. Cross matching blood for transfusions requires interpretation before that blood can be released for transfusion to the patient. An error in cross-matching can kill the patient. I can tell you that my stress level as a Medical Technologist was much higher than my stress level as Histotechnician. There are many more examples where the knowledge and judgement of the tech will determine the outcome of patient result reporting and treatment. The pathologist does not make the final decision for the Med Tech before they release results to the clinician. We were also responsible for notifying the clinician when the patient results were critical.
Rene J Buesa
Sent by: email@example.com
05/15/2008 09:22 AM
"Dawson, Glen" , firstname.lastname@example.org
RE: [Histonet] Salary Scales
And it will keep that way until histotechs star demanding what is deserved!
Have you realized that histotechs are the only specialists in the medical lab that have to make decisions all along the process?
When to reject a too thick slice of tissue to assure proper processing?
What part to embed to cut?
Up to where trim the block discarding parts of the specimen FOR EVER?!
Which section to take or which to discard FOR EVER?!
When to stop differentiation in a special stain?
There is no other area of the ML that has to take so many decisions, and they are better paid. And will be until the HTs decide to take action and demand what is deserved.
Just my opinion (as usual!).
"Dawson, Glen" wrote:
Histonet mailing list
Histonet mailing list