If the xylene is considered to be contaminated, then would that not be the 
case for any other clearant used to replace it?  Do these powers consider it 
to be more acceptable to pay for getting rid of contaminated limonene, for 
example, instead of contaminated xylene?  Is the alcohol disposed of in a 
safe manner as well?  Do they pay for this?  This should be a bigger issue 
than just the cost, surely.

Bryan Llewellyn



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sharon Allen" 
To: "Histonet (E-mail)" 
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:03 AM
Subject: [Histonet] Xylol substitutes


>
> Does anyone use xylol substitutes, if so how good are they?
> We do CJD testing & "the powers that be" don't like to pay for getting rid
> of contaminated xylol. I don't want to have to start testing different
> substitutes, so any help would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks
> Sharon
> sallen@hsc.mb.ca
>
> This e-mail and/or any documents in this transmission is intended for the 
> address(s) only and may contain legally privileged or confidential 
> information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution, copying or 
> dissemination is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in 
> error, please notify the sender immediately and return the original.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet