Re: mouse monoclonal on mouse tissue

From:Carrie Kyle-Byrne

RE: mouse monoclonal on mouse tissue
isotype specific secondaries are also very helpful when using an ABC protocol.
 
Carrie Kyle-Byrne, BHS, HT(ASCP)
Assoc. Research Scientist II
Molecular Target Research
 
Exelixis, Inc.
170 Harbor Way
P.O. Box 511
South San Francisco
CA 94083-0511 USA
 
Phone: (1 650) 837-8023
Fax: (1 650) 837-7240
Email: ckbyrne@exelixis.com
 
________________________________________________________________
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure
or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
----- Original Message -----
From: Cynthia Favara
To: 'Carrie Kyle-Byrne' ; Gayle Callis
Cc: 'HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu'
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: mouse monoclonal on mouse tissue

I agree it is definitely worth a try. I use a number of mouse Antibodies on mouse tissue. I think the key is what you are trying to detect and the tissue you are trying to detect the antigen in. A significant amount of background is caused by the anti Mouse IgG this can often be significantly decreased by a good perfusion. Many times a simple no primary control can give you the background noise and you can judge for yourself.

Cynthia Favara

-----Original Message-----
From: Carrie Kyle-Byrne [mailto:ckbyrne@exelixis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Gayle Callis
Cc: 'HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu'
Subject: Re: mouse monoclonal on mouse tissue


i beg to differ gayle.  i've done several mouse-on-mouse (most recent
notable is Ki-67 (clone MM1)) that have no or very little background using
our standard protocol (using Dako Envision+/DAB) with no additional
blocking.  i find it less time consuming if i try the aby first with no
special protocol and only go to the "mouse-on-mouse" stuff if absolutely
necessary.

Carrie Kyle-Byrne, BHS, HT(ASCP)
Assoc. Research Scientist II
Molecular Target Research

Exelixis, Inc.
170 Harbor Way
P.O. Box 511
South San Francisco
CA 94083-0511 USA

Phone: (1 650) 837-8023
Fax: (1 650) 837-7240
Email: ckbyrne@exelixis.com

________________________________________________________________
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure
or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact
the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gayle Callis" <uvsgc@montana.edu>
To: <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: mouse monoclonal on mouse tissue


> The answer to the question is yes, background will be a huge problem.
>
> Try a mouse on mouse kit, Zymed, Innogenex, Scytek, Vector all have
special
> kits containing special blockers. I hope I haven't missed a vendor, if so,
> speak up if you have the kit.
>
> Another alternative is DAKO ARK kit, based on biotinylation of the primary
> antibody and their special blocking, etc.
>
> Some people have tried more than one kit for success, they do vary - but
> you may be lucky with first one you try.
>
>
>
>
> Gayle Callis
> MT,HT,HTL(ASCP)
> Research Histopathology Supervisor
> Veterinary Molecular Biology - Marsh Lab
> Montana State University - Bozeman
> 19th and Lincoln St
> Bozeman MT 59717-3610
>
> 406 994-6367 (voice mail)
> 406 994-4303 (FAX)
>
> email: UVSGC@montana.edu
>
>


<< Previous Message | Next Message >>