Re: non-histology topics
I think that the off-message stuff helps to give the group character. Since
it only takes a few minutes to go through the histonet mail anyway it's
surely not that important.
----- Original Message -----
From: Amos Brooks <email@example.com>
To: Lorraine Gibbs <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 12:03 AM
Subject: Re: non-histology topics
> I've not heard many complaints. It doesn't bother me. If I don't care
> read it I have a delete button. I'd rather hear about Robert Browning and
> Flowery Twats than Medicare reimbursement at this point.
> Amos Brooks
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lorraine Gibbs" <email@example.com>
> To: <Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 12:11 PM
> Subject: non-histology topics
> > Hi to all-
> > I absolutely agree with Jennifer Philopena's comments on non-histology
> > topics (twats, Fawlty Towers). These subjects do not belong on a
> > board for histology. It really undermines the credibility of Histonet.
> > Please find another discussion board for these subjects-lockerroom.net?
> > twat.org?
> > Jen did not need to pre-apologize.
> > Lorraine Gibbs
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>