Re: digital imaging
I certainly don't know much in this area, but I stick by my original position
that the consumer is ill-prepared to predict either the physical stability or
the accessibility of computer storage media.
>>Rather than wire recorders, a better analogy might be LP's. Even as they
got better and better, the basic idea of a flat, plastic disk with a bumpy
groove scratched into the surface remained the standard for selling audio
recordings. Even today, a decade after they became "obsolete," you can easily
buy a turntable that will play everything from ancient 78's to 45 singles.<<
Well, not easily. A few months ago I spent a delightful morning with an old
friend, an accomplished southern Appalachian fiddler (who by way of a day job
is a PhD biochemist turned rural nurse-anesthetist - he knows more about
anesthesia than anybody else I ever met) who collects old 78 rpm recordings
of Appalachian music. He has a really heavy-duty 78 rpm player that must be
able to vary the rpm between 72 and 80, and pick up vibrations that move the
needle either up-and-down or side-to-side. Then there's the problem of
getting phonograph needles, which I don't begin to understand. But that
morning gave me some idea of what our present computer storage media will
look like when my grandson is the age I am now (and I've been raised to the
Lodge Eternal in the Heavens).
78 rpm audio technology, I should explain, became obsolete around 1948 with
the introduction of 33 rpm long playing ("LP") records, though 78's continued
to be manufactured for another ten years or so.
Bob Richmond
Samurai Pathologist
Knoxville TN
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>