Hi,
There seem to be a few antibodies that don't titer out as far (at least for
me), and with the EnVision, some of the nuclear markers don't work well at
all..... the EnVision + is better, but there are some things that I think I
like ABC better... or more specifically by comparing Dako to Dako, I prefer
the LSAB2 in a lot of instances.... especially if you consider cost.
Bonnie Whitaker
UT--Houston

----- Original Message -----
From: denise M m Long-Woodward <denisew2@juno.com>
To: <peterp@cafe.berkeley.edu>
Cc: <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 4:30 AM
Subject: Re: enVision


> Works much better that ABC but it is double or triple the cost. It does
> virtually eliminate the worry about endogenous biotin labeling which can
> be a real plus if you do a lot of GI, liver, kidney or brain biopsies.
> Denise Long Woodward
>
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2000 19:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Peter Poon
> <peterp@cafe.berkeley.edu> writes:
> > has anyone tried to use a immunostaining method named enVision?
> > Does it work better than ABC? Thanks.
> >
> >
> >    __________________________________________
> >    \    Peter Poon                           \     _         ______
> > |
> >     \   http://cafe.berkeley.edu/~peterp      \  /
> > \___-=0`/|0`/__|
> >      \  (510)649-9654                          \_\          / | /
> > )
> >      /                                         /  `/-==__ _/__|/__
> > -|
> >     /                                         /   *             \ |
> > |
> >    /                                         /                   (o)
> >
> >    ------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
> Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
> Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
> http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
>