| From: | DDittus787@aol.com |
| To: | SANTIAG@pathology.ufl.edu, HistoNet@pathology.swmed.edu |
| Reply-To: | |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
I have tried both, both work well, however the Zymed v-line (clone Tab 250)
needed no retrieval, only protease, kept morphology very nicely, works
consistently, costs less. Ventana to expensive. Pathologists are very happy
with the TAB250.
Dana