Re: animal hair x-sections
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | James Hall <rmkdhjh@ucl.ac.uk> |
To: | Rhidian Harrington <r.harrington@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au>, histoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Hi Rhidian,
A number of years ago my pathologist wanted x-sections of hair and I
embedded them in wax by allowing the wax to slightly solidify on the bottom
of a metal mould and used forceps to orientate the hairs end on in the
partially solidified wax. It was then just a matter of allowing the wax to
cool and cut and mount the sections. If I remember correctly, the
pathologist examined the hairs without the removal of the wax from the
section.
Jim.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
At 11:16 08/05/00 +1000, Rhidian Harrington wrote:
>I, with the help of Bruce Abaloz, have been trying to do cross
>sections of animal hairs without much success. I collected the hairs
>during a fauna survey in Pakistan. A cross section is the best
>characteristic for identifying unknown animal hairs. The literature
>(which is old) suggests that you use stainless steel slides with 0.8
>mm holes drilled in them. The hairs are packed tightly in the holes
>and then cut off on either side of the slide. A cover slip can be
>mounted and the cross section viewed.
>
>Does anybody know a different, more efficient method than this for
>doing cross sections of hairs?
>
>Thanks,
>Rhidian
>
>
>_________________________
>Rhidian Harrington
>Department of Zoology
>University of Melbourne
>Melbourne, Victoria
>AUSTRALIA 3010
>
>Ph: +61-3-8344 4354 (W)
> +61-3-9844 2703 (H)
>Fax: +61-3-8344 7909
>
>
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>