Re: Thanks (but gripe, grumble)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Amos Brooks <atbrooks@snet.net> |
To: | Jeff & Wanda Gray <jefwan@flash.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Hi Wanda,
I have had the same problem. When giving an opinion I occasionally give it
personally unless it is one I take a hard line on or I feel I am not alone in
having. I dont mean to defeat the purpose of the histonet but I'd rather bend a
little than catch flack from someone who may disagree with me and end up all
stressed out over a d*#n computer. :-)
Amos Brooks
Jeff & Wanda Gray wrote:
> Hello to all:
> Must add to this thread that I sometimes reply "off net" because I gave my
> opinion at one time and had a sales rep who was "less than pleased" with my
> reply call MY BOSS to complain! So, to avoid having my boss dragged in
> should my PO some rep I reply off net when the question involves an opinion
> rather than a generic procedure. (this story is sad but true...)
> Wanda Shotsberger
> (HT ASCP)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jennifer.hoover@pharma.Novartis.com
> [mailto:jennifer.hoover@pharma.Novartis.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 11:02 AM
> To: Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
> Subject: Re: Thanks (but gripe, grumble)
>
> I also agree! Even though the information shared is not always
> directly
> related to my daily activities I still enjoy reading what others are doing
> in
> Histoland. Furthermore, I have a file folder overflowing with Histonet
> e-mail
> messages which I have printed because I find the information interesting and
> realize that I may need it for future reference! Thank you to all who share
> the
> knowledge!
>
> Jennifer Hoover
> Novartis Pharmaceuticals
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Hoover/PH/Novartis on
> 04/26/2000
> 11:58 AM ---------------------------
>
> "J. A. Kiernan" <jkiernan@julian.uwo.ca> on 04/26/2000 10:30:04 AM
>
> To: Histonet <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
> cc: (bcc: Jennifer Hoover/PH/Novartis)
> Subject: Re: Thanks (but gripe, grumble)
>
> Evidently there are still some knowledgeable people answering
> HistoNet questions directly to the askers, depriving the rest
> of us of the benefit of their wisdom and expertise. I didn't
> see a single reply to the question about the Machiavello stain
> (and still don't know what it is), but Renee did receive
> answers. The whole idea of a listserver like this one is to
> share our ignorance by asking, and to share our knowledge by
> answering to everyone. It says so in the bumph we receive
> every time we type "subscribe" on the Subject line!
>
> Often there is more than one answer to a question, and there
> can be requests for clarification, added hints, and even
> occasional arguments. Open discussions are the life & soul
> of a forum such as this one, for people with common interests
> in a science that will never be fully understood, partly
> because it's also both a craft and an art. Please reply to
> HistoNet, not just to individuals.
>
> Thanks to Linda and Herb for getting a better server. The delays
> in posting messages are already noticeably shorter.
>
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Renee Escalona wrote:
>
> > Thanks to all of you who responded to my question about the Machiavello
> > stain. I've got enough info to go on and I think I'm ready to tackle this
> > stain.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>