Re: Coverglass thickness
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Andrea Grantham <algranth@U.Arizona.EDU> |
To: | histonet@pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Scott,
Where are you going with all these minisurveys?
Maybe you should compile them all and write a book on the quirkinesses of
histotechs!
I use 1.5 thickness because most of my slides are for research purposes.
For light microscopy using dry objectives it may not make a difference, but
I am not the expert.
Andi
At 09:36 AM 5/10/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Hello Histonetters,
>
>I have another question of the day to pose:
>
>Is there a reason, other than cost, why your lab would
>prefer 1.0 thickness coverglass over 1.5 thickness?
>
>What is the reason your lab chooses what it currently
>uses?
>
>How about your Pathologists'?
>
>PS- If you use tape, are you considering switching
>back to glass?
>
>Scott Taft HT(ASCP)
>Tucson, AZ
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com/
.....................................................................
: Andrea Grantham, HT(ASCP) Dept. of Cell Biology & Anatomy :
: Sr. Research Specialist University of Arizona :
: (office: AHSC 4212) P.O. Box 245044 :
: (voice: 520-626-4415) Tucson, AZ 85724-5044 USA :
: (FAX: 520-626-2097) (email: histo@u.arizona.edu) :
:...................................................................:
http://www.cba.arizona.edu/histology-lab.html
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>