Re: Carbonic anhydrase
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | jm36@st-andrews.ac.uk (Jill McVee) |
To: | histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 1999 10:35:13 +0000 (GMT) |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
>From: "Beth Bray" <bbray@netside.com>
>To: "Jill McVee" <jm36@st-andrews.ac.uk>, <histonet@pathology.swmed.edu>
>Subject: Re: Carbonic anhydrase
>Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:36:03 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>
>Dear Jill,
>
>For my senior year research, I was tracking the location of carbonic
>anhydrase during sclerite formation in a species of octocoral found here
>along the East and Gulf coasts of the US. I used rabbit antibodies made
>against the CA of our little "critter" and then labeled with gold-tagged
>goat anti-rabbit antibodies. Then I post-stained with osmium. The TEM
>images were lovely after the post-staining. They looked just like they had
>been prepared for structural observation rather than antibody labeling. I
>had quite a time with high backgrounds at first, but was able to solve that
>problem by using Tween 20 and immunoprecipitating my primary antibody using
>Staph A. If any of this sounds interesting to you, let me know and I will
>send you what I have.
>
>Regards,
>Beth Bray
>bbray@netside.com
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>