Errata correction: I will be leaving EBS on April 18, not 13. Sorry for
the confusion!
Phil McArdle
--
Phil McArdle
Microwave Product Manager
Energy Beam Sciences, Inc.
29-B Kripes Rd.
East Granby, CT 06026
Tel: 800.992.9037 x 341
Mobile: 860.597.6796
Fax: 860.653.0422
You must be the change you want to see in the world.
- Mahatma Gandhi
NOTE: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is legally privileged, confidential and exempt
from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, however, there's
not a lot I can do about it, and it was probably my mistake anyway. So
please do the right thing and make this e-mail go away. Thank you.
Jeff Birkner wrote:
> What Rene has mentioned is true. However, we have been able to cut our reagent and paraffin usage by 80% which is a huge cost savings. We have also been able to do away with formalin and xylene, so no more costly monitoring!
>
> Jeff Birkner, CT(ASCP)
> Pathology Section Manager
> Collaborative Laboratory Services, LLC
> 1005 Pennsylvania Ave.
> Ottumwa, IA 52501
> 641-684-4621
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-bounces@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Rene J Buesa
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 8:55 AM
> To: Stephanie Weaver; histonet post
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] microwave processors
>
> IF you have a turn around time issue, it is worth considering the MW option, BUT if you are not pressured by the TAT it is NOT worth it.
> Consider the following: NO matter how fast you process your tissues, you will need EXACTLY the same time PRE and POST processing to take care of your 100 cassettes.
> You probably will cut in half your processing time (since you are aiming at 3 hours processing time), so your total TAT will be about 80% of your present TAT.
> And NO, a modified lab MW oven will not produce the same results.
> If you want I can send you a study I published on the subject.
> René J.
>
> Stephanie Weaver wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
>
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
|