[Histonet] RE: which new cryostat
|From:||"Stephen Peters M.D." |
We have had 4 Leica 1850s at HUMC in a very busy surg path practice for about 10 years.
I originally chose this cryostat, because it was the most comfortable and easy for me
to cut using brush technique. My hands were not twisted in a painful knot. I felt the stage
was the most accessable for retrieving. I also found the controls very easy and in no
time I could function at my usual pace. It seemed to have a very solid microtome and
was considerably more spacious than our old tissue teks. I compared the Leica to the
other brands at this clinical level and found this to be my choice for all of the above reasons.
. I am very happy with the choice I made. They have been reliable work horses and
have required very little more than it was the routine maintenence. I have been quite
satisfied with the quality of the preparations I am capable of making and I find the
work space accomodating. You have 360 degree chuck rotation and a single knob for
X-Y axis adjustment. I have kept up with most of the new designs of the other brands. I would still buy another 1850 tomorrow. Trust me none of them are perfect, or even close, but of what is out there this is my choice. I must mention that I do have a relationship with Leica for a about a year. They have been helping me promote an embedding system that I developed
while practicing in these cryostats. I thought about whether to write this at all, but everything I have to say came long before. I have had great success in a very busy practice with
these cryostats I am happy to recommend them.
Stephen Peters M.D.
Pathology Innovations, LLC
410 Old Mill Lane,
Wyckoff, NJ 07481
201 847 7600
Senior Attending Pathologist
Hackensack University Medical Center
201 996 4836
Histonet mailing list
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>