Re: Fwd: immunodiluent survey results.
|From:||Connie McManus <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
How are you coming to your figures ---are you assuming that the other
preparations are made in-house? I get the same figures if I calculate
them this way. Since I somehow missed the original message on this
survey, i don't know if it was specified whether the BSA/PBS diluents
are in-house or commercially prepared. Aren't there commercial
preparations of PBS with BSA? Couldn't these also be included is
commercial as well as in-house prep??? that would certainly change the
results, eh? *g*
"Dr. Ian Montgomery." wrote:
> Have to disagree with your interpretation. When you do the
> sums 38.1% use a commercial diluent, while the sensible 61.9% make
> their own.
> > Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:23:16 +1200
> > From: Aidan Schurr <Aidan.Schurr@hvh.co.nz>
> > Subject: immunodiluent survey results.
> > To: email@example.com
> > Hi all
> > Survey results as follows:
> > Diluent # responses
> > 0.1% BSA in PBS: 3
> > 1% BSA in PBS: 4
> > + tween or triton-X: 3
> > + Azide 2
> > Commercial 8
> > PBS 1
> > So it seems the majority of us use commercial diluent, followed
> > closely by BSA in PBS (of various concentrations - I find myself
> > wondering if the dilution is important at all!)
> > Interesting!
> > Aidan
> > New Zealand
> > __
> > aidan schurr b.m.l.sc
> > section head, histology
> > hutt valley health
> > lower hutt
> > new zealand
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > ++64 4 570 9173
> Dr. Ian Montgomery,
> West Medical Building,
> University of Glasgow,
> G12 8QQ.
> Tel: 0141 339 8855. Extn:6602.
> Fax: 0141 330 2923
> e-mail: email@example.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>