Re: CJD Question. An Emotive Defence
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Medilex123@aol.com |
To: | E.Carter@oxfordbiomedica.co.uk, Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
Dear Emma,
I apologise for making you cross. After much consideration I have decided to
reply via HISTONET.
I suspect that we share mutual concerns about patients although it may not
seem to be the case based on the email you quoted. In truth I don't care
whether a patient is black, white, yellow, a nazi, a communist, gay ,
"straight", criminal or a pillar of the community. I'm not concerned about
gender or creed either. I don't care how the patient came to be ill or
infective. Its not important. A patient is a patient, with real worries about
ill health. A patient relies upon others to help them. They are the only
reason we do what we do. I don't work for pathologists or surgeons, I do my
work for the the most important person, the patient. This creed was hammered
into me as a trainee and I've never forgotten it . I make damn sure my
trainee colleagues don't forget it too.
All I do care about in this situation is whether the tissue from that patient
poses a risk to me or my colleagues. I have a professional and a legal duty
to care about them. You will see a section in my reply to Rob which explains
my thoughts on our duty to patients. It's a bit dry - sorry.
Am I uncomfortable about not doing frozens on tissues from ill, infected
patients? Yes. But I can live with it because we offer alternatives. And becau
se I reduce the risks as far as I can I (and do so for my collegues too ) we
will continue to live (in good health) with this difficult paradox.
It's not judgemental, or uncaring it's simply dispassionate risk assessment.
Sincerely yours,
Glyn Woodward
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>