RE: xylene vs histolene
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Nocito, Joseph" <joseph_nocito@srhc.iwhs.org> |
To: | 'Tonya Van Der Velde' <tonya.van.der.velde@marine.csiro.au>, Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Tonya,
I switched back to xylene because we were getting inconsistant staining with
our immunos. Also, the H & E stain wasn't as crisp. One other problem we
had with a xylene substitute was the tissue was not being processed
correctly. My techs expressed their concern about xylene and the hazards.
I had an air sampling performed and it showed we were reading 1.0ppm xylene
over an 8 hour period. I think OSHA's maximum exposure is 100 ppm per 8
hours. We haven't had a problem since.
Joe Nocito, B.S., HT(ASCP)QIHC
Histology Supervisor
Christus Santa Rosa Hospitals
San Antonio, Texas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tonya Van Der Velde [SMTP:tonya.van.der.velde@marine.csiro.au]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 11:44 PM
> To: Histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
> Subject: xylene vs histolene
>
> Hi
>
> Do many labs use histolene now instead of xylene? Does it work as well?
> Are there any disadvantages in using this chemical
> instead of the standard xylene?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> regards
> Tonya
>
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>