Re: ?? (automation trends)
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Tim Morken <timcdc@hotmail.com> |
To: | histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jun 1999 11:52:57 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain; format=flowed |
Susan,
I would imagine labs will automate as much as possible as long as the
results are equal or better than present manual methods. Even for a small
lab automation saves time and that means more can be done by the same
personnel. Some stains are easily automatable and others are not, however,
so it may depend on the mix of stains a particular lab does.
That being said, I can't think of any independant source that has studied
the issue. The manufacurers themselves have, I'm sure. I doubt they would
make the machines unless they thought there was a market for it, and that
takes some study.
Tim Morken, B.A., EMT(MSA), HTL(ASCP)
Infectious Disease Pathology
Centers for Disease Control
MS-G32
1600 Clifton Rd.
Atlanta, GA 30333
USA
email: tim9@cdc.gov
timcdc@hotmail.com
Phone: (404) 639-3964
FAX: (404)639-3043
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Susan Cohane" <susan_cohane@millet.com>
To: Histonet <histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu>
Subject: ??
Date: 29 Jun 99 10:37:47 -0400
I'm looking to find information on current industry trends in relation to
the utilization of automated staining systems versus manual preparation of
non-routines. Any insight on where to find this type of data, especially on
the Internet, would be much appreciated!
Susan M. Cohane
617.722.0019
1.800.634.5315
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>