Re: DuraEdge vs AccuEdge
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Ford M. Royer" <froyer@bitstream.net> |
To: | |
Reply-To: | |
Date: | Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:07:57 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
This, along with the coverslipper question, sounds like someone is using the
Histonet to conduct a free competitive marketing survey for their commercial
company. Doesn't Scott Taft work for Ventana/RMC? Is this proper "Netiquette"?
Ford Royer/Minneapolis MN
(by the way, I work for Analytical Instruments)
"Sebree Linda A." wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> We use both blades but I much prefer AccuEdge. I tend to get thick and
> thinning with Duraedge even after adjusting the angle.
>
> Linda Sebree, HT
> University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics
> Department of Laboratory Medicine
> IHC/ISH Laboratory
> A4/204-2472
> 600 Highland Ave.
> Madison, WI 53792-2472
>
> Phone: (608)265-6596
> FAX: (608)263-1568
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Taft [SMTP:ss336@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 8:57 AM
> > To: HistoNet Server
> > Subject: DuraEdge vs AccuEdge
> >
> >
> > Histonetters,
> >
> > If you had the choice between using DuraEdge blades, (HP or LP), or
> > AccuEdge blades, which would you choose and why?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott Taft/Tucson AZ
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>