RE: WHICH wax feedback
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
| From: | Patsy.Ruegg@UCHSC.edu |
| To: | jaa@rshhis.demon.co.uk |
| Reply-To: | |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jun 1999 09:08:34 -0600 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
I have for years been looking for someone to write an ASCP Tech Sample
Exercise on this subject of "WHICH WAX". Any takers, now that the subject
has surfaced again.
Patsy Ruegg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Almond [mailto:jaa@rshhis.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:43 AM
To: histonet@Pathology.swmed.edu
Subject: WHICH wax feedback
Just a quick note to thank those who responded to my posting
regarding
paraffin waxes in routine use.
There were eleven responses covering a wide variety of
suppliers/brands
(out of the eleven - an amazing seven brands were quoted). I
guess firm
conclusions could not be made from such a small sample but
the clear
message offered in comments etc. was that waxes are much the
same
irrespective of the supplier! Provided their melting point
properties were
accurate and they were "clean" there were no poor performers
identified.
It was interesting to note the a couple of labs use separate
waxes for
infiltration (at a lower temperature) and embedding (harder
grade).
Thanks once again to all those who replied, as for me - I
won't be
changing but at least I'm reassured there isn't a clear
(head and shoulders
above the rest) market leader out there I was blissfully
unaware of.
Jim
Royal Shrewsbury Hospitals NHS Trust
Histology Dept
Tel: +44 (0) 1743 261168 Fax: +44 (0) 1743 355963
Email: hist@rshhis.demon.co.uk
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>