RE: Coverslipper preference
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
| From: | "Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org> |
| To: | "'Bartlett, Jeanine'" <jqb7@cdc.gov>, "'Scott Taft'" <ss336@yahoo.com>, "'HistoNet Server'" <HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu> |
| Reply-To: | |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Jun 1999 10:26:56 -0400 |
| Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Ditto!
-----Original Message-----
From: Bartlett, Jeanine [SMTP:jqb7@cdc.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 10:09 AM
To: 'Scott Taft'; HistoNet Server
Subject: RE: Coverslipper preference
It depends on what you need. For ease of use I've been told that the Sakura
cannot be beat, but that the tape is very expensive. If you need to use
glass coverslips the Leica is your best bet.
Jeanine H. Bartlett, HT(ASCP)
Centers for Disease Control
NCID, DVRD, IDPA
1600 Clifton Rd., NE MS/G-32
Atlanta, GA 30333
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Taft [mailto:ss336@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 9:51 AM
To: HistoNet Server
Subject: Coverslipper preference
Histonetters,
If you had to choose between the Leica CV 5000 vs the Sakura auto
coverslipper, which would you choose and why?
Thanks,
Scott Taft/Tucson AZ
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>