RE: [Histonet] Nuclear artefact II


You're ignoring the question furtively:)

-----Original Message-----
[] On Behalf Of Marshall
Terry Dr,Consultant Histopathologist
Sent: 29 June 2007 14:52
To: Kemlo Rogerson;; Gale, Nadia;
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Nuclear artefact II

You're flapping desperately:-)


-----Original Message-----
From: Kemlo Rogerson [] 
Sent: 29 June 2007 14:05
To: Marshall Terry Dr, Consultant Histopathologist;; Gale, Nadia;
Subject: RE: [Histonet] Nuclear artefact II

I thought she'd said inadequate fixation not just formalin fixation;
could it be that the frozen section and pleural fluid were inadequately
fixed? Or not fixed at all, which I suppose would prove her point,
wouldn't it?

Kemlo Rogerson
Pathology Manager
DD   01934 647057 or extension 3311
Mob 07749 754194; Pager 07659 597107;
Your job is a manifestation of your spirit in the physical world. You
can pretend that this is not the case, basically ignore it, or you can
consciously claim it. You get to choose. --Ric Giardina 

This e-mail is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please accept my apologies; please do not disclose, copy or
distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on
its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please inform me that this message has gone astray before deleting it.
Thank you for your co-operation

Histonet mailing list

Histonet mailing list

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>