RE: the Results are in!
I think her survey is perfectly accu-edge-rate, you a little sensitive because your blades didn't get the results you'd like to see? Why the harsh remarks? How much science is required to tally responses to a question?
Take a day or two off and relax a bit,
From: Cliff Berger [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 08:25
To: Vinnie Della Speranza; firstname.lastname@example.org
Cc: Donna McClellan
Subject: Re: the Results are in!
In fairness to all the companies making blades, and to those who are using
them as well, everyone should be aware that your <> has has no
statistical merit whatsoever. This has not been a science behind your poll
in completely skewed so the results are meaningless.
> From: Vinnie Della Speranza
> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:52:32 -0400
> To: email@example.com
> Cc: Donna McClellan
> Subject: the Results are in!
> thank you to all who responded to my query re: best disposable microtome
> here are the results:
> Accu-Edge was recommeded by 55% of respondents. This blade was
> recommended more than four times more frequently than the next highest
> recommended blade.
> Richard Allen was recommended by 12.5% of respondents
> Sturkeywas recommended by 12.5% of respondents
> Shandon was recommended by 10% of respondents
> Surgipath was recommended by 5% of respondents
> DuraEdge was recommended by 5% of respondents
> Vinnie Della Speranza
> Manager for Anatomic Pathology Services
> Medical University of South Carolina
> 165 Ashley Avenue Suite 309
> Charleston, SC 29425
> Ph: 843-792-6353
> fax: 843-792-8974
The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>