RE: Order Entry -Reply
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org> |
To: | "Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org>, 'Janice Mahoney' <jmahoney@alegent.org>, histonet@pathology.swmed.edu, jmacdonald@sach.org |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Can you tell that I am totally losing my mind!!!
I LEFT out a word (I am now letting out a few).
Let me see if this one is correct now!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Weems, Joyce
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 2:43 PM
> To: Weems, Joyce; 'Janice Mahoney'; histonet@pathology.swmed.edu;
> jmacdonald@sach.org
> Subject: RE: Order Entry -Reply
>
> Oops - I let out a vital word!!! This should read "I don't know
> about the new Copath - but Cerner is definitely NOT as well geared
> to AP as Sunquest was". Quite a difference there!
>
>
> > I don't know about the new Copath - but Cerner is definitely as well
> > geared
> > to AP as Sunquest was. Good luck!
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > While we're on the subject of accessioning, I have a question. We're
> in
> > > the process of choosing a new LIS. We're down to two systems,
> Sunquest
> > > and Cerner. Does anyone out there have a good feel for how the two
> > > compair as far as ordering and accessioning AP specimens goes? Which
> is
> > > faster with less key strokes?
> > > Thanks for any input.
> > > Jan Mahoney
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>