RE: Order Entry -Reply

<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From:"Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org>
To:"Weems, Joyce" <JWEEMS@sjha.org>, 'Janice Mahoney' <jmahoney@alegent.org>, histonet@pathology.swmed.edu, jmacdonald@sach.org
Reply-To:
Content-Type:text/plain

Can you tell that I am totally losing my mind!!! 
I LEFT out a word (I am now letting out a few). 
Let me see if this one is correct now!

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Weems, Joyce 
> Sent:	Thursday, June 22, 2000 2:43 PM
> To:	Weems, Joyce; 'Janice Mahoney'; histonet@pathology.swmed.edu;
> jmacdonald@sach.org
> Subject:	RE: Order Entry -Reply
> 
> 	Oops - I let out a vital word!!! This should read "I don't know
> about the new Copath - but Cerner is definitely NOT as well geared
> 	to AP as Sunquest was". Quite a difference there! 
> 
> 
> > I don't know about the new Copath - but Cerner is definitely as well
> > geared
> > to AP as Sunquest was. Good luck!
> > 
> > > Hello,
> > > While we're on the subject of accessioning, I have a question.  We're
> in
> > > the process of choosing a new LIS.  We're down to two systems,
> Sunquest
> > > and Cerner.  Does anyone out there have a good feel for  how the two
> > > compair as far as ordering and accessioning AP specimens goes?  Which
> is
> > > faster with less key strokes?
> > > Thanks for any input.
> > > Jan Mahoney



<< Previous Message | Next Message >>