RE: Workload/Productivity
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | "Johnson, Mickey" <JohnsoM@shmc.org> |
To: | 'Hewlett Bryan' <HEWLETT@HHSC.CA>, histonet@pathology.swmed.edu, 'RUSS ALLISON' <Allison@Cardiff.ac.uk> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Hewlett,
Could you give us some specific numbers for average blocks and slides and
stains per month or year?
Thanks,
Mickie
-----Original Message-----
From: Hewlett Bryan [mailto:HEWLETT@HHSC.CA]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 12:02 PM
To: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu; 'RUSS ALLISON'
Subject: RE: Workload/Productivity
Russ,
Canadian Workload measurement units are alive and well!
As you say, not perfect but effective.
Bryan
> ----------
> From: RUSS ALLISON[SMTP:Allison@Cardiff.ac.uk]
> Sent: July 20, 2000 3:18 AM
> To: histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
> Subject: RE: Workload/Productivity
>
> Do I assume that Canadian Workload measurements are now dead
> and buried? Although far from perfect, it was about the best I ever
> came accross.
> Phil Hall (if you are reading, Phil, or Phil Bullock) in Bristol,
> England, worked out the stats ratio for "histotechs/pathologist
> using figures from the South West of England labs. They came up
> with different figures for University (Teaching), large and small
> hospitals.
> It all depended upon the Roayal of Pathologists figures of 4000
> (mixed) specimens being the maximum workload of a fully qualified
> histopathologist. That figure has been criticised as arbitrary - and
> it probably is no more than a "best guess".
> Please don't ask me for the figures (my filing system would
> certainly let me down). Hopefully Phil or someone else from the
> South West will read this.
>
>
> Russ Allison,
> Dental School
> Cardiff
> Wales
>
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>