Will you share them with us?

> ----------
> From: 	Hewlett Bryan[SMTP:HEWLETT@HHSC.CA]
> Sent: 	Thursday, July 20, 2000 2:02 PM
> To: 	histonet@pathology.swmed.edu; 'RUSS ALLISON'
> Subject: 	RE: Workload/Productivity
> 
> Russ,
> 
> Canadian Workload measurement units are alive and well!
> As you say, not perfect but effective.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> > ----------
> > From: 	RUSS ALLISON[SMTP:Allison@Cardiff.ac.uk]
> > Sent: 	July 20, 2000 3:18 AM
> > To: 	histonet@pathology.swmed.edu
> > Subject: 	RE: Workload/Productivity
> > 
> > Do I assume that Canadian Workload measurements are now dead 
> > and buried?  Although far from perfect, it was about the best I ever 
> > came accross.
> > Phil Hall (if you are reading, Phil, or Phil Bullock) in Bristol, 
> > England, worked out the stats ratio for "histotechs/pathologist 
> > using figures from the South West of England labs.  They came up 
> > with different figures for University (Teaching), large and small 
> > hospitals.
> > It all depended upon the Roayal of Pathologists figures of 4000 
> > (mixed) specimens being the maximum workload of a fully qualified 
> > histopathologist.  That figure has been criticised as arbitrary - and 
> > it probably is no more than a "best guess".
> > Please don't ask me for the figures (my filing system would 
> > certainly let me down).  Hopefully Phil or someone else from the 
> > South West will read this.
> > 
> > 
> > Russ Allison, 
> > Dental School
> > Cardiff
> > Wales
> > 
>