FW: AP computer systems
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Sheila Poellein <sheila_poellein@deaconess.com> |
To: | 'histonet' <histoNet@pathology.swmed.edu> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
-----Original Message-----
From: Jig1357@aol.com [mailto:Jig1357@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 5:42 PM
To: sheila_poellein@deaconess.com
Subject: Re: AP computer systems
Hi! We are a new client of Copath--we went live May 30 of this year. It
was
an interesting transition, and a great learning experience. We have found
that specimen accessioning (surgicals and gyn) takes approximately 3 times
longer than Sunquest accessioning. Rather than just typing on the keyboard,
we are now having to type as well as use the mouse to move from various
windows and tabs. The good thing about Copath is the computerization of
consult material (we were previously recording all consults on forms which
were then filed) Right now we are doing both methods only because we are
still in transition, but in the future I hope that we can eliminate the
paper
file. There are many good features with Copath and someone down the line
from us techs and accessioners definitely benefits by way of information
retrieval and ease of generating reports. We are still working out the
kinks
and have a few minor adjustments to make, but overall it is a good system.
I
have nothing but Sunquest to compare it to and the fact that it is
Windows-based makes it an improvement over Sunquest. Hope this helps!
Jeanne Godine
Pathology Consultants
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>