Re: glutaraldehyde
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>
From: | Tim Morken <timcdc@hotmail.com> (by way of histonet) |
To: | histonet <histonet@magicnet.net> |
Reply-To: | |
Content-Type: | text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Supposedly glutaraldehyde crosslinks more than formalin and so tissues
fixed in it should show less immunoreactivity. Even so, electron
microscopists have no problem immuno-labeling their glut-fixed, resin
sections. So I would say it won't cause any problems IF it has not been
fixed too long (will cause same problems as over-fixing in formalin).
Tim Morken, B.S., EMT(MSA), HTL(ASCP)
Infectious Disease Pathology
Centers for Disease Control
MS-G32
1600 Clifton Rd.
Atlanta, GA 30333
USA
email: tim9@cdc.gov
timcdc@hotmail.com
FAX: (404)639-3043
----Original Message Follows----
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 10:16:50 -0500
From: Scott Stickles <STICKLES@mailbox.hscsyr.edu>
Subject: glutaraldehyde
To: HistoNet@Pathology.swmed.edu
One quick question:
What is your experience in immumoreactivity in glutaraldehyde-fixed
tissue
vs. formaldehyde fixed tissue?
In particular, I want to IHC stain for iNOS and MMP in tissues that were
fixed in glutaraldehyde.
Thanks,
Scott Stickles
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
<< Previous Message | Next Message >>